|
|
|
January
League Luncheon
|
|
Mr.
Robert Scarborough, director of the SC Association of School Administrators,
will talk with us about the State's education budget.
Time:11:45
- Place at Capital Senior Center (1650 Park Circle)
New
Caterer - M&M Catering!baked
chicken & beans with a veggie option.
Those
not eating will contribute to the cost of the room & guest lunch ($1.50).Reservations
essential - I'll assume you want chicken unless you specify veggie.Feel
free to invite interested friends.
Reserve
via e-mail or call me by 9:00 Thursday morning at work - 896-4174 $8.00
Note:This
is the third of a series of meetings with education leaders as the League
is interested in learning what it can do to advocate improvements in public
education, in this case specifically the budget.
|
hhhhhhh |
On
February
8th, (second Friday) the LWV Public Policy Luncheon guest will be the
team which the City Council has hired to plan and design the "CanalSide"
project (at old CCI) into a significant riverfront development with
the potential to lure a diverse group of people to live, work, and play
in the city center.Reservations
are essential - contact "suzrhodes@juno.com" for more information.
|
|
the League! |
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Corrections
to your Member Directory:
e-mail
for Jean Beily should be jbeilysc@mindspring.com
on
inside cover for Board of Directors the home phone for Deborah Hotchkiss
should be 252-8911.
Please
call Carol Medich at 783-9786 with any changes to the directory.
PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION WORKS!!
The
League of Women Voters of the Columbia Area has formally expressed concern
to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that SCE&G has not
been forthcoming with its research and management responsibilities for
Lake Murray.At the same time, SCE&G
has been going forward with numerous land sales, some of potential environmental
significance and others of interest to the citizens of the Columbia
area because of aesthetics, habitat, water quality, or general Lake
access.In apparent consideration
of Dr. Mary Kelly and Dr. Cynthia Flynn's letter to FERC (published in
previous League Lines), FERC responded back to SCE&G that long-overdue
reports were to be provided by SCE&G to FERC.In
addition, FERC took issue with the fact that SCE&G was finding time
for land sales, but not prioritizing long-standing FERC management responsibilities.When
SCE&G responded to FERC, the Commission again found it necessary to
remind SCE&G that FERC's questions were not being answered.Most
recently, SCE&G sold some of the Lake Murray Project land without the
prior approval of FERC.Although
there is a clause that states that land sales can be considered approved
if FERC doesn't reply within 45 days, the two groups had a gentleman's
agreement that communication would take place prior to sales, even if the
communication was informal.The League
is about to complain about the continued land sales and the continued lack
of long-overdue management reports.Incidentally,
these overdue management reports (some should have been final in 1999)
are critical to the aesthetic, environmentally sustainable, and accessible
future of Lake Murray.
You
may want to read her book,
Freedom’s Child, ahead of time.
|
|
·We
oppose the shipment of plutonium by DOE to South Carolina without a firm,
legally enforceable "exit strategy;"
·We
oppose the shipment of plutonium by DOE to any site without safe, secure
long-term storage facilities;
·We
oppose short-cutting a fair, open, and credible scientific and public process
for determining how best to manage radioactive wastes;
·We
oppose the shipment of plutonium by DOE to South Carolina for fabrication
as MOX fuel at the Savannah River Site and the use and storage of MOX fuel
at the Catawba and McGuire nuclear plants; and
·We
support timely and full funding and continued development of the plutonium
immobilization program and continued development of the plutonium immobilization
program as the best alternative for the disposition of all weapons grade
plutonium shipped to South Carolina.
This resolution is similar to one adoptedby
the SC Sierra Club.As you probably
know, Gov. Hodges has refused to allow an initial shipment of ten tons
of plutonium from Rocky Flats, CO to come into this state because no funds
have been appropriated for the planned immobilization and there is no repository
ready to receive it once it is immobilized. The much larger portion, from
dismantled nuclear weapons, is supposed to be converted to MOX fuel for
burning at aging Duke reactors in the heavily populated Charlotte, Rock
Hill area. The Mox Fuel Fabrication Facility (MFFF) is scheduled to be
built at SRS to accomplish this.There
are major hurdles to overcome before this becomes a reality, including
relicensing of the old reactors. The resolution addresses the fear that
plutonium will come in and effectively be stored here in what will become
a de facto nuclear dump.
TO:State
and Local League Presidents
FROM:Carolyn
Jefferson-Jenkins, President and the Board of Directors of the League of
Women Voters of the United States
RE:The
Importance of Speaking with One Voice
In recent days, League members across the country have responded vigorously
to urgent calls to action in support of real election administration reform.
Members' response to a series of Grassroots Lobby Requests targeting legislation
in both the House and the Senate has been outstanding.As
part of that effort, over 1,100 phone calls were made by League members
and others to key U.S. Senators on December 12th through a special 800-number
funded by the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights.
Unfortunately, we were not all speaking with one voice on this priority
issue.An internal communication
on local League letterhead that expressed an opposing viewpoint was
shared with an outside official and ultimately was cited during the floor
debate on the Ney-Hoyer bill (H.R. 3295) in the House.
Thus, while League members were busy urging their representatives
to support an amendment addressing the flaws in H.R. 3295, Representative
Hoyer was using the local League letter as evidence of League support for
the bill as written.It is quite
likely that the letter contributed to the narrow defeat of the motion
to allow consideration of the perfecting amendment advocated by the
LWVUS - and to the passage of a deeply flawed bill.
Not only was this a setback for genuine election reform, it also undermined
the strong leadership that the League has shown on this issue for the past
year.Our pivotal role can be measured
both by the frequency with which the League has served as a key spokesperson
for reform (most recently in invited testimony to the House Judiciary
Committee on December 5th) and by the heavy pressure that supporters of
the Ney-Hoyer bill (such as the Carter-Ford Commission) exerted in recent
days to try to convince the League to change its position.The
League has demonstrated its credibility and clout on Capitol Hill during
this time, only to have its unity and resolve brought into question
at the last minute.
This unfortunate incident underscores the importance of our most basic
action policies and procedures.Most
basic of all are our Bylaws, which provide that "Leagues may act on
national program only in conformitywith
positions taken by the LWVUS."This
helps ensure that
the League speaks with one voice and is
essential for our effectiveness as an advocacy organization.
Over the past months, we have provided numerous detailed statements about
our election administration reform goals and about our efforts to see these
goals incorporated into legislation and enacted into law.With
respect to the Ney-Hoyer bill, an extensive call to action was issued on
November 20th, detailing the many flaws in that legislation.A
follow-up alert on December 11th contained several links to additional
information about the League's rationale and strategy.As
with any lobby request, members who had questions about the call to action
were encouraged to seek clarification from our veteran lobbying staff.
A League board may certainly choose not to respond to a particular call
to action but may not take action in opposition to a position articulated
by the LWVUS.And individual League
members are always free to take whatever action they wish, as long as they
do so in their own name and leave no doubt that they do not speak for the
League.
This is a critical time in our campaign for election administration reform.
We call on all League members to respect our action policies and procedures.
We urge Presidents to convey this information and have the appropriate
conversations at all levels of the organization.A
united front will strengthen our voice and our efforts to ensure that every
American citizen's right to vote is protected.
If you have any questions, or would like to discuss this matter further,
please contact your LWVUS Board liaison, call the President's hotline at
1-800-424-2937, or email us at lwv@lwv.org.
LEAGUE
IS "DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED" AT PASSAGE OF NEY-HOYER; LOOKS TO SENATE FOR BETTER
ELECTION REFORM BILL
WASHINGTON,
DC - Dr. Carolyn Jefferson-Jenkins, President of the League of Women Voters
of the United States, issued the following statement today [December 12,
2001] after House passage of the Ney-Hoyer Bill (H.R. 3295):
"The League is deeply disappointed that the House has passed a significantly
flawed bill.We strongly support
effective election reform, and will work to ensure that sound legislation
is adopted by the Senate.
"The League is also concerned that the procedures used to push the bill
through the House prohibited the consideration of a package of civil rights
amendments that would have made corrections in several key areas. These
amendments would have ensured that voting machines are accessible and accurate,
that voters will receive provisional ballots when needed, that the National
Voter Registration Act is protected, thatenforcement
will be effective, and that polling places will be physically accessible
for those with disabilities.It is
ironic that House leaders blocked members from voting on alternate approaches
to reforming our nation's voting systems.
"We need strong election reform legislation.The
lesson of the disastrous 2000 elections is that voters need basic federal
protections to ensure that every eligible American citizen has a full opportunity
to cast his or her vote on Election Day, and to have that vote count.The
Ney-Hoyer bill fails to provide effective standards to ensure that voting
machines will work.It also contains
significant loopholes.
"This means that, under this bill, voters cannot be sure that their names
will be on the voter registration rolls when they go to vote.Voters
cannot be sure that they will have provisional ballots when they're needed.And
voters cannot be sure that polling places and voting machines will be accessible
for those with disabilities.
"We now look to the Senate to produce a genuine election reform bill. Bipartisan
discussions are continuing there on election reform.The
League strongly urges those involved on the Senate side to move forward
on those discussions to produce a bill that will protect the most basic,
most precious right of citizens in a democracy - the right to vote," Jefferson-Jenkins
said.
The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages
the informed and active participation of citizens in government, works
to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences
public policy through education and advocacy.
Friday,
December 21, 2001
From:Lela
Sallis <LSallis@lwv.org>
Subject:Press
Coverage Over the Past Few Weeks
Last week, the League was at the center of the legislative battle over
election reform and received widespread publicity as a result.On
Dec. 12, the House of Representatives passed the Ney-Hoyer bill.Dr.
Carolyn Jefferson-Jenkins, LWVUS President, issued a statement calling
it "a significantly flawed bill."She
noted that among other things, the bill lacks effective federal standards
to ensure provisional ballots, to ensure access to the polls for people
with disabilities, and to ensure that voting systems are accurate.
On Dec. 13, a group of Senators introduced a bipartisan compromise, bearing
the names of Sens. Christopher S. Dodd (D CT) and Mitch McConnell (R KY).Jefferson-Jenkins
praised the Senate bill, saying it "can be the antidote to the flawed election
reform bill recently passed by the House." (See the "Get the News" section
of the website for both statements and articles mentioning the League: http://interactive.lwv.org/News/NewsMain.cfm)
The
League's views were picked up by the national wire services and sent all
over the country.Here's a list of
news media coverage of which we are aware:
Associated
PressUnited Press International
National
Public RadioKnight-Ridder News Service
Copley
News ServiceThe Washington Post
The
Los Angeles TimesThe Philadelphia
Inquirer
The
Milwaukee Journal-SentinelThe Miami
Herald
NewsdayThe
San Jose Mercury-News
The
Wichita, Kan. Eagle
VOTERS
AND CANDIDATES FLOCK TO THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS' DEMOCRACYNET (DNET)
DURING ELECTION 2001
Thousands
of Candidates Covered on DNet (www.dnet.org)
WASHINGTON,
DC
- The League of Women Voters announced today that its online resource for
election and voter information, DNet, covered more than 9,200 candidates
and drew in millions of citizens with nonpartisan voting information in
2001's off year elections.
Throughout the election cycle, DNet was the only nationwide, nonprofit
website to provide information on candidates running for office at the
federal, state and local levels.Highlights
of DNet's 2001 election coverage included statewide races in New Jersey
and Virginia and high profile elections in cities across the country.
The site was inundated with voters before they headed to the polls.Dnet
showed a pre-election spike in viewership with more than 3 million "hits"
in the two weeks before November 6 and culminating in more than 1 million
"hits" before noon on Election Day.
With League members providing a vast network of volunteers, DNet offered
voters information, including bios and issue statements, on more than 9,200
candidates for approximately 4,000 offices in 30 states.More
than 280 ballot measures were covered, providing summaries of the ballot
questions and arguments for and against them.
"This interactive website is the next logical step in continuing the League's
81 years of voter services and education in the age of the Internet," said
Dr. Carolyn Jefferson-Jenkins, Chair of the League of Women Voters Education
Fund."Our members are pioneering
online election coverage and candidate debates in their communities throughout
the country."
DNet, which began its first year of nationwide operation in 2000, has provided
information on more than 26,000 national and local candidates in 2000 and
2001.The site is the first to offer
online coverage of community races such as Kalamazoo, MI City Commission,
Minneapolis, MN Library Board and judicial, town, village and school board
elections in numerous states on one national forum.DNet
is poised to begin its coverage of 2002 federal, state and local elections.Primaries
for the 2002 election cycle begin next March.
To learn more about what the League of Women Voters has been doing, check
out the "Get the News" section of our website (http://interactive.lwv.org/News/NewsMain.cfm
<http://interactive.lwv.org/News/NewsMain.cfm
) for additional press releases and new clips on national, state &
local activities.
"'Good
Enough' Is Not Good Enough":THE
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS RELEASES ELECTION SURVEY FINDINGS
Washington, DC (November 9, 2001) - The League
of Women Voters released findings today from a survey fielded through its
local member Leagues, which provide a detailed look at election practices
across the country.Findings indicate
that election administration processes work well only"sometimes"
or "usually."Rarely do they
"always" work as they should.
"Given that elections can be won or lost by extremely narrow margins, these
levels of performance are not acceptable," said League of Women Voters
President Dr. Carolyn Jefferson-Jenkins."'Good
enough' is not good enough."
"When one stands back and looks, in total, at all the problems that voters
may encounter on election day, one observes a frequent lack of concern
for the treatment of voters by the election administration system," continued
Jefferson-Jenkins."Borrowing private
sector terminology, we can call this a lack of 'a customer service orientation'
toward the voter on election day."
"As we saw again with Tuesday's elections," continued Jefferson-Jenkins,
"many races are won or lost by very narrow margins, so it is imperative
that every vote always count.The
League is dismayed that a year after the irregularities of the November
2000 elections, when we all got a wake-up call, voting still seems to be
a hit-or-miss proposition for so many of our citizens.With
important elections coming up in 2002 and later in 2004, it is imperative
that election administration practices be improved and reformed where needed."
"Recent events have changed the political landscape.The
public and elected leaders are faced with unprecedented public policy
issues," continued Jefferson-Jenkins."If
we want citizens to engage in informing leaders, then citizens need to
know that their voices really are heard.With
the irregularities seen in the 2000 elections, voters have reason to question
whether their voices - their votes - really do count.The
League has been working - and will continue to work - to assure that every
vote counts and to engage citizens in dialogue and engagement around important,
timely issues."
The League of Women Voters fielded the survey through its member local
Leagues to look at election administration practices based on concerns
growing out of the irregularities seen in the November 2000 elections.
The survey findings were released at a League of Women Voters symposium,
held at the National Press Club on Friday, November 9, 2001.The
symposium examined the outcome of the November 6, 2001 elections in
light of the September 11 events and the November 2000 elections, as well
as the continuing need for election reform.
Survey
findings point to important areas of concern about elections, especially
voter access and poll workers' training and working conditions on election
day.Findings indicate that, among
several concerns:
Voters'
names are not regularly getting on to voter registration lists, resulting
in voters being turned away;
Voting
machines do not consistently function properly;
There
are not sufficient numbers of voting machines in many locations;
Voters
frequently have to stand in long lines when waiting to vote;
Visually
impaired voters do not consistently have access to private and independent
voting;
There
are insufficient numbers of poll workers, and those who do work the polls
usually do not receive adequate training and are required to work long
hours - as much as 12 to 16 hours at a stretch.These
conditions can contribute to poll workers becoming discourteous or
unhelpful toward voters; and
There
is insufficient communication on the part of election officials, especially
regarding changes in the location of polling places.
The League survey was fielded through its local Leagues, which gathered
quantitative information through interviews with election officials
and also offered qualitative information based on League members' experience
with and participation in election administration in their communities.
"In just one year, American democracy has been questioned and our way of
life has been assaulted," said Jefferson-Jenkins."American
citizens have a heightened sense of the preciousness of their rights and
the importance of their responsibilities.It
is imperative that all of us defend against external threats and also work
to address the internal flaws in our democratic processes that were
so evident in the November 2000 elections. With nearly 1,000 state and
local Leagues in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico,
the Virgin Islands, Hong Kong and in hundreds of communities across the
country, the League of Women Voters is uniquely positioned to carry forward
the work to improve our system while also encouraging broad civic engagement."
On November 6th, 2001, millions of American citizens exercised their
right to vote - but there is still more to do to make every sure that every
vote always counts," said Jefferson-Jenkins."There
also is more to do to strengthen our communities.At
a time when American citizens want to support their country, the League
urges citizens to get involved.Each
of us has the power to strengthen democracy and make it work.A
ballot, a donation, a letter to an official or to the media, or volunteering
in our communities can achieve significant and lasting results.Let
us all demonstrate by our actions what we cherish about our country and
our democratic rights."
The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization,
encourages the informed and active participation of citizens in government,
works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences
public polity through education and advocacy.
To learn more about what the League of Women Voters has been doing, go
to "Get the News" on the League's web site at www.lwv.org
For more information or to arrange interviews with Dr. Jefferson-Jenkins,
contact Bob Adams, Acting Director of Communications, League of Women Voters
- 202.263.1334.
¯¯Calendar
Notes: 2002¯¯
Lizard’s Thicket on Beltline$
7,
14, 21, 28
– Mon.’s, 4 PM* Lexington Cty. Council
8,
22
–Tuesdays,
6:00 PM* Richland Cty. Council